Advanced Search
Print - Close Window
www.greenwood.com/catalog/GM0064.aspx
All Greenwood Products
Presidential Defiance of "Unconstitutional" Laws Reviving the Royal Prerogative
(Click to Enlarge)
Book Code: GM0064
ISBN: 0-313-30064-X
ISBN-13: 978-0-313-30064-6
232 pages, tables
Greenwood Press
Publication: 8/30/1998
List Price: $119.95 (UK Sterling Price: £70.00)
Availability: Print on demand
Media Type: Hardcover
Trim Size: 6 1/8 x 9 1/4
Subjects:
Series Title: Contributions in Legal Studies
Series Number: 86
Reviews:
  • This is an excellent study...This study is an initial effort likely to be cited in appellate briefs the next time presidential refusal to comply with a law that he or she believes is unconstitutional goes to the courts.
    —Choice
  • May's book is well-written, informative and extremely well-documented. There is just enough background and historical detail to enlighten us without permitting us to become bogged down in minutia...For anyone with and interest in Constitutional law and the tendency of the executive branch toward consolidation of power, Christopher May's book is highly recommended.
    —Free Speech Yearbook
    1999 vol. 37
  • May does an admirable job of discussing this increasingly important practice and its lack of support in the Constitution and precedent....this book is a valuable contribution to our growing understanding of the balance of power among the three branches of government and can be recommended to scholars of any of the three branches of government.
    —The Law and Politics Review
  • May's arguments are persuasive and his work is richly documented.... Through an examination of presidential vetoes, signing statements, and objections to previously enacted laws, May constructs a unique empirical record of presidential defiance....As for the future, Professor May's prescription supplies a fair compromise.
    —Books on Law, The Jurist
  • Christopher May makes a clear and convincing case that the responsibility for deciding the constitutionality of a law lies not with the president but with the courts.
    —The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Description: Since the mid-1970s American presidents have, with growing frequency, claimed that they have the power to ignore any law they believe is unconstitutional. Beginning with a review of the English constitutional backdrop against which the U.S. Constitution was framed, this book demonstrates that the Founders did not intend to confer on the president a power equivalent to the royal prerogative of suspending the laws, which was stripped from the English Crown in 1689. The author examines each of the nearly 150 instances in which presidents from George Washington to Jimmy Carter have objected to the validity of a law, in order to determine whether or not the president then ignored the law in question. This examination of the historical record reveals that prior to the mid-1970s the White House only rarely failed to honor a law that it believed to be unconstitutional.
Table of Contents:
  • Introduction
  • The Original Understanding
  • The Royal Suspending and Dispensing Powers
  • The Founders' Understanding
  • Presidential Practice, 1789-1981
  • Presidential Practice: Introduction
  • Laws Enacted over a Constitutionally Based Veto
  • Signing Statements: Introduction
  • Signing Statements: Acquiescence, Avoidance, and Compliance
  • Signing Statements: Noncompliance
  • Laws Enacted During a Prior Administration
  • Presidential Practice: A Summary of the Historical Record
  • Limiting Presidential Defiance
  • Selected Bibliography
  • Index
LC Card Number: 98-11095
LCC Class: KF5065
Dewey Class: 342
All rights reserved. Copyright © 1999-2009 Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.
88 Post Road West, Westport CT 06881, (203) 226-3571